<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for JetBrains PyCharm Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm</link>
	<description>PyCharm — Python &#38; Django IDE built on IntelliJ platform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:19:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PyCharm 2.0 EAP open by Kirby Turner</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2011/09/pycharm-2-0-eap-open/#comment-3127</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirby Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/?p=1022#comment-3127</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s unfortunate to read there are no plans to support web2py. This is the one missing feature that is keeping me from buying PyCharm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s unfortunate to read there are no plans to support web2py. This is the one missing feature that is keeping me from buying PyCharm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PyCharm 2.0.1 update by Boris</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2011/12/pycharm-2-0-1-update/#comment-3126</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/?p=1239#comment-3126</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really glad to see this update so quickly. Thanks for you work, guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really glad to see this update so quickly. Thanks for you work, guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PyCharm 2.0.2 update available by Tate Kim</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2012/02/pycharm-2-0-2-update-available/#comment-3124</link>
		<dc:creator>Tate Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/?p=1254#comment-3124</guid>
		<description>How can intellij-python users update to this version (2.0.2) ?

And current python plug-in version is  2.8.1, so I am a little bit confused.

Anyway, great work !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can intellij-python users update to this version (2.0.2) ?</p>
<p>And current python plug-in version is  2.8.1, so I am a little bit confused.</p>
<p>Anyway, great work !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PyCharm 2.0.2 update available by Joe White</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2012/02/pycharm-2-0-2-update-available/#comment-3123</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/?p=1254#comment-3123</guid>
		<description>The &quot;full release notes&quot; link isn&#039;t to the full release notes -- just abridged release notes, with no mention of e.g. CoffeeScript fixes (even though you&#039;ve previously mentioned that at least some of the CoffeeScript fixes should be in this version).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;full release notes&#8221; link isn&#8217;t to the full release notes &#8212; just abridged release notes, with no mention of e.g. CoffeeScript fixes (even though you&#8217;ve previously mentioned that at least some of the CoffeeScript fixes should be in this version).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PyCharm 2.0.2 Release Candidate by Joe White</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2012/01/pycharm-2-0-2-release-candidate/#comment-3121</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/?p=1251#comment-3121</guid>
		<description>By &quot;as of now&quot;, do you mean that the CoffeeScript fixes were not all backported when the first 2.0.2 RC came out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By &#8220;as of now&#8221;, do you mean that the CoffeeScript fixes were not all backported when the first 2.0.2 RC came out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PyCharm 2.0.2 Release Candidate by Dmitry Jemerov</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2012/01/pycharm-2-0-2-release-candidate/#comment-3119</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Jemerov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/?p=1251#comment-3119</guid>
		<description>Joe,
As of now, all of the CoffeeScript changes and fixes have been backported into the PyCharm 2.0.2 branch. We&#039;re considering releasing one more RC build before the final release, to make sure nothing is broken there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,<br />
As of now, all of the CoffeeScript changes and fixes have been backported into the PyCharm 2.0.2 branch. We&#8217;re considering releasing one more RC build before the final release, to make sure nothing is broken there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PyCharm 2.0.2 Release Candidate by Dmitry Jemerov</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2012/01/pycharm-2-0-2-release-candidate/#comment-3118</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Jemerov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/?p=1251#comment-3118</guid>
		<description>Dan,
Please submit a CPU snapshot as described in http://devnet.jetbrains.net/docs/DOC-1212</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,<br />
Please submit a CPU snapshot as described in <a href="http://devnet.jetbrains.net/docs/DOC-1212" rel="nofollow">http://devnet.jetbrains.net/docs/DOC-1212</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PyCharm 2.0.2 Release Candidate by Dan Ostrowski</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2012/01/pycharm-2-0-2-release-candidate/#comment-3116</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Ostrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/?p=1251#comment-3116</guid>
		<description>Actually, it looks like it&#039;s a single template file that&#039;s causing my problems. It&#039;s really large and has a lot of imports, which puts the CPUs on my laptop into a tailspin and overheats the laptop. o.O

But I&#039;ve confirmed, now, that it happens on 2.0.1 and 1.5.4... not sure why I didn&#039;t run into this before, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it looks like it&#8217;s a single template file that&#8217;s causing my problems. It&#8217;s really large and has a lot of imports, which puts the CPUs on my laptop into a tailspin and overheats the laptop. o.O</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ve confirmed, now, that it happens on 2.0.1 and 1.5.4&#8230; not sure why I didn&#8217;t run into this before, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PyCharm 2.0.2 Release Candidate by Dan Ostrowski</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2012/01/pycharm-2-0-2-release-candidate/#comment-3115</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Ostrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/?p=1251#comment-3115</guid>
		<description>2.0.1 seems to have absolutely tanked performance on my laptop and this new update doesn&#039;t seem to fix it.

When I run my work project on 1.5.4 my computer functions fine, but when I try with 2.0.1 it brings my laptop to it&#039;s knees with CPU usage. (I&#039;m using an i7 processor with 6GB of memory on this laptop.)

Any hints on what I should do to try to gather information about this problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.0.1 seems to have absolutely tanked performance on my laptop and this new update doesn&#8217;t seem to fix it.</p>
<p>When I run my work project on 1.5.4 my computer functions fine, but when I try with 2.0.1 it brings my laptop to it&#8217;s knees with CPU usage. (I&#8217;m using an i7 processor with 6GB of memory on this laptop.)</p>
<p>Any hints on what I should do to try to gather information about this problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PyCharm 2.0.2 Release Candidate by Joe White</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2012/01/pycharm-2-0-2-release-candidate/#comment-3113</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/?p=1251#comment-3113</guid>
		<description>Weird. Some of the CoffeeScript bugs that are marked as &quot;fixed&quot; did make it into this version, but others did not.

Is it likely that you&#039;ll be able to merge the fix for RUBY-10241 before you ship? It was marked as &quot;Duplicate&quot; in YouTrack on 19 Jan, with a note claiming it was already fixed and would be in the next build of PyCharm, but the bug is still easily reproducible in this new build, using the original steps in YouTrack. This bug makes the code-formatting feature basically unusable, so it&#039;d be great if you could get that fix in.

It&#039;d also be nice if the newly-introduced PY-5602 (actually just looks like an incomplete / poorly-coded fix for RUBY-10199) could get fixed too, but that may be asking for too much if you&#039;re trying to rush this &quot;release candidate&quot; out after only one EAP build...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird. Some of the CoffeeScript bugs that are marked as &#8220;fixed&#8221; did make it into this version, but others did not.</p>
<p>Is it likely that you&#8217;ll be able to merge the fix for RUBY-10241 before you ship? It was marked as &#8220;Duplicate&#8221; in YouTrack on 19 Jan, with a note claiming it was already fixed and would be in the next build of PyCharm, but the bug is still easily reproducible in this new build, using the original steps in YouTrack. This bug makes the code-formatting feature basically unusable, so it&#8217;d be great if you could get that fix in.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d also be nice if the newly-introduced PY-5602 (actually just looks like an incomplete / poorly-coded fix for RUBY-10199) could get fixed too, but that may be asking for too much if you&#8217;re trying to rush this &#8220;release candidate&#8221; out after only one EAP build&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

