<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for WebStorm &amp; PhpStorm Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide</link>
	<description>Tips &#38; tricks, news, how-to’s</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PhpStorm &amp; WebStorm 3.0.2 by jep</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/2012/02/phpstorm-webstorm-3-0-2/#comment-6338</link>
		<dc:creator>jep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/?p=3283#comment-6338</guid>
		<description>Is this update broken as well?  I ask because I start up webstorm and it pops up the dialog box saying &quot;A new version of JetBrains WebStorm is available.&quot;  It tells me my current version is 3.0.1 and the new version is 3.0.2.  The choices it provides are &quot;More Info...&quot;, &quot;Remind Me Later&quot; and &quot;Ignore This Update&quot;.  If you click on &quot;More Info...&quot;, it takes me to the webpage for the 3.0.1 release, not this one.

Also, shouldn&#039;t there be a button that says &quot;okay then, apply the update&quot;?  If there is no patch, why is it telling me about it?  Is this a matter of them needing better configurability for the update process?  As it stands, it&#039;s VERY confusing.

Or is the patch busted again like it was for 3.0.1?  That one apparently finally went through for me (I started with 3.0).  But it&#039;s weird that the More Info button links to the wrong page.  Also, I wonder if the fact that I was on the EAP before going to 3.0 screwed things up.  FYI, I went into the settings and switched the updates from EAP to &quot;New Major Version Releases&quot;.  Still have the same problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this update broken as well?  I ask because I start up webstorm and it pops up the dialog box saying &#8220;A new version of JetBrains WebStorm is available.&#8221;  It tells me my current version is 3.0.1 and the new version is 3.0.2.  The choices it provides are &#8220;More Info&#8230;&#8221;, &#8220;Remind Me Later&#8221; and &#8220;Ignore This Update&#8221;.  If you click on &#8220;More Info&#8230;&#8221;, it takes me to the webpage for the 3.0.1 release, not this one.</p>
<p>Also, shouldn&#8217;t there be a button that says &#8220;okay then, apply the update&#8221;?  If there is no patch, why is it telling me about it?  Is this a matter of them needing better configurability for the update process?  As it stands, it&#8217;s VERY confusing.</p>
<p>Or is the patch busted again like it was for 3.0.1?  That one apparently finally went through for me (I started with 3.0).  But it&#8217;s weird that the More Info button links to the wrong page.  Also, I wonder if the fact that I was on the EAP before going to 3.0 screwed things up.  FYI, I went into the settings and switched the updates from EAP to &#8220;New Major Version Releases&#8221;.  Still have the same problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New in 3.0: More &#8216;Surround With&#8217; actions for PHP by MaximAL</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/2012/02/new-in-3-0-more-surround-with-actions-for-php/#comment-6335</link>
		<dc:creator>MaximAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/?p=2700#comment-6335</guid>
		<description>Parentheses around array_ky_exists are redundant.
IDEA can process theese particular cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parentheses around array_ky_exists are redundant.<br />
IDEA can process theese particular cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JavaScript unit testing support by stlum9495</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/2011/10/javascript-unit-testing-support/#comment-6318</link>
		<dc:creator>stlum9495</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/?p=2765#comment-6318</guid>
		<description>New Feature request for debugging JSTestDriver within IDE!  This would make JetBrains better than anyone on market right now...

http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issue/IDEA-81226</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Feature request for debugging JSTestDriver within IDE!  This would make JetBrains better than anyone on market right now&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issue/IDEA-81226" rel="nofollow">http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issue/IDEA-81226</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New in 3.0: More &#8216;Surround With&#8217; actions for PHP by nnmatveev</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/2012/02/new-in-3-0-more-surround-with-actions-for-php/#comment-6273</link>
		<dc:creator>nnmatveev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/?p=2700#comment-6273</guid>
		<description>Please submit an issue about your case. Thank you for feedback!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please submit an issue about your case. Thank you for feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WebStorm 3.0: The JavaScript IDE! by David Faivre</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/2011/12/webstorm-3-0-the-javascript-ide/#comment-6257</link>
		<dc:creator>David Faivre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/?p=3178#comment-6257</guid>
		<description>Having the same issue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having the same issue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;use strict&#8221; from EcmaScript 5 is supported in WebStorm / PhpStorm! by mark foley</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/2011/01/use-strict-from-ecmascript-5-is-supported-in-webstorm-phpstorm/#comment-6256</link>
		<dc:creator>mark foley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/webide/?p=1324#comment-6256</guid>
		<description>Hi - I just registered webstorm 3, and searched the net for &#039;option explicit for javascript&#039;.  Came across this and it&#039;s the best news I&#039;ve heard so far for making JS easier to work with!

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; I just registered webstorm 3, and searched the net for &#8216;option explicit for javascript&#8217;.  Came across this and it&#8217;s the best news I&#8217;ve heard so far for making JS easier to work with!</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PhpStorm &amp; WebStorm 3.0.1 by jep</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/2012/01/phpstorm-webstorm-3-0-1/#comment-6255</link>
		<dc:creator>jep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/?p=3267#comment-6255</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification, Alexey.  Apparently, my 3.0 patched itself to 3.0.1 at some point without me noticing.  Of course, now it&#039;s on to 3.0.2 and no patch yet.  :D

Not a major complaint, as I love the product!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification, Alexey.  Apparently, my 3.0 patched itself to 3.0.1 at some point without me noticing.  Of course, now it&#8217;s on to 3.0.2 and no patch yet.  <img src='http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Not a major complaint, as I love the product!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New in 3.0: More &#8216;Surround With&#8217; actions for PHP by Dario De Lucia</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/2012/02/new-in-3-0-more-surround-with-actions-for-php/#comment-6225</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario De Lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/?p=2700#comment-6225</guid>
		<description>Guys you are just doing a great work! Keep going on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys you are just doing a great work! Keep going on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Debugging JavaScript in Google Chrome by adrian</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/2011/04/debugging-javascript-in-google-chrome/#comment-6224</link>
		<dc:creator>adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/webide/?p=2153#comment-6224</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t manage to set up remote javascript debugging with Chrome for my Zend Framework MVC application hosted on a Zend Server installation on Windows 7. My js files are located in .../project/httpdocs/js and my project base URL is http://localhost/project/httpdocs/. 

I have managed to set up PHP Web Application debugging with path mapping (symlinks) and all, but for Javascript debugging I&#039;m not sure how to set up path mapping (remote URLs for local files) in the debug configuration. When I run my Javascript debug configuration, the debugger actually stops in the included jQuery (jquery.min.js) and shows values and all, but the breakpoints in my own js files are ignored.

I don&#039;t find any good tutorials and http://wiki.jetbrains.net/intellij/Remote_JavaScript_debugging_with_WebStorm_and_PHPStorm doesn&#039;t really help, either. Can someone help me out or point out relevant resources?

Thanks, Adrian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t manage to set up remote javascript debugging with Chrome for my Zend Framework MVC application hosted on a Zend Server installation on Windows 7. My js files are located in &#8230;/project/httpdocs/js and my project base URL is <a href="http://localhost/project/httpdocs/" rel="nofollow">http://localhost/project/httpdocs/</a>. </p>
<p>I have managed to set up PHP Web Application debugging with path mapping (symlinks) and all, but for Javascript debugging I&#8217;m not sure how to set up path mapping (remote URLs for local files) in the debug configuration. When I run my Javascript debug configuration, the debugger actually stops in the included jQuery (jquery.min.js) and shows values and all, but the breakpoints in my own js files are ignored.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t find any good tutorials and <a href="http://wiki.jetbrains.net/intellij/Remote_JavaScript_debugging_with_WebStorm_and_PHPStorm" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.jetbrains.net/intellij/Remote_JavaScript_debugging_with_WebStorm_and_PHPStorm</a> doesn&#8217;t really help, either. Can someone help me out or point out relevant resources?</p>
<p>Thanks, Adrian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PhpStorm &amp; WebStorm 3.0.2 by Michael Topor-Grabowski</title>
		<link>http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/2012/02/phpstorm-webstorm-3-0-2/#comment-6221</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Topor-Grabowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jetbrains.com/webide/?p=3283#comment-6221</guid>
		<description>On win Xp it shows me the new version and when i click on daownload and update patch it restarts phpstorm and nothing happens... 

no java errors...
how to proceed now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On win Xp it shows me the new version and when i click on daownload and update patch it restarts phpstorm and nothing happens&#8230; </p>
<p>no java errors&#8230;<br />
how to proceed now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

