Django vs. Flask: Which Is the Best Python Web Framework?
Even if you are new to web development, you probably already know that there are two main web frameworks in the Python world: Django and Flask. According to the Python Developers Survey 2022 conducted by JetBrains, 39% of developers reported using either or both.
Whether you are a beginner thinking of what to learn to get your first job in web development, a developer looking for a framework to build a web application on, or a team lead considering various technologies for an upcoming project, this article should help you make the right choice.
What is Django?
Django is a high-level Python web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.
Developed in 2005 by a group of developers, Django was created to handle the intensive requirements of news-oriented websites. Since then, the framework has grown into one of the most popular in the Python ecosystem.
What is Flask?
Flask is a micro-framework for Python designed to be simple, lightweight, and flexible.
The framework was built by Armin Ronacher and released in 2010. It was made to offer an alternative to the more heavyweight Django framework. Flask’s minimalist design allows developers to start quickly and scale as needed, making it a common choice for both small projects and large applications.
Key features of Django and Flask
Before we examine each framework’s specifics (including their templating systems, URL routing, database management, and more), it’s helpful to get an overview of the key features that differentiate Django and Flask.
Django
- Comprehensive framework: Django is known for its “batteries-included” philosophy. It offers a wide range of built-in features, such as an ORM, authentication, and an admin interface, making it ideal for larger, more complex applications.
- Structured and consistent: Django enforces a clean, organized project structure, which helps for maintaining code quality and consistency, particularly in larger teams.
- Security-focused: With built-in features like CSRF protection and a secure user authentication system, Django is designed with security in mind.
- Scalability: While traditionally, and more commonly, used for monolithic applications, Django can be adapted for microservices.
Flask
- Lightweight and flexible: As a microframework, Flask provides the essentials and lets you choose additional tools as needed, making it highly flexible for smaller projects.
- Quick to learn: Flask’s simplicity makes it an excellent choice for beginners or those looking to quickly prototype applications.
- RESTful by design: Flask encourages RESTful design patterns, making it a strong candidate for building APIs and web services.
- Customizability: With a wide range of extensions available, Flask allows for customization and the integration of third-party libraries to suit the specific needs of your project.
Summary table of features
The table below summarizes the main features of both frameworks, giving you a quick reference to compare Django and Flask side by side. Use this information to form an initial idea of which framework might best suit your needs – we’ll explore each aspect in more detail in the following sections.
| Feature | Django | Flask |
| Templates | Django template language, restricted syntax, best practices encouraged | Jinja2, flexible syntax, compatible with many frameworks |
| URLs | Complex, powerful routing, regex support, not fully RESTful | Simplified, RESTful-compliant, routes and logic in one file |
| Databases | Built-in ORM, limited to supported databases | ORM support via extensions, NoSQL databases can be used |
| Authentication and authorization | Built-in apps: Django auth and admin | Extensions: Flask-Admin, Flask-Login, Flask-Security |
| Testing | Built-in features, automatic test database isolation | Built-in features, manual handling or extensions for DB tests |
| Architecture | Primarily for monolithic applications, clear structure | Ideal for microservices, lightweight, easily extendable |
| Learning curve | Steeper, but consistent architecture facilitates onboarding | Easier initial learning, but requires more learning for larger projects |
Templating system: Django templates vs Jinja2 templates
If we only had to work with static HTML pages, that would be very easy, but most of today’s web applications include dynamic content. This is why we need a templating system.
Django has a built-in template engine, while Flask is fully compatible with Jinja2 templates.
Jinja2 was influenced by the Django template language. That’s why their syntax looks pretty similar. For example, both use double curly braces ({{ }}) for variables and curly braces with percent signs ({% %}) for logical elements, like loops and conditional statements.
At the same time, there are significant differences. Let’s look at these in more detail.
Compatibility
Django templates are tightly integrated with the Django framework. Some of their features, like template inheritance and template tags, are Django-specific.
Jinja2 is an independent template engine, compatible with various frameworks, including Django and Flask. That’s right: Although Django templates are the default choice for Django apps, you can use Jinja2 with Django, too! However, only 14% of Django developers do so, according to the Django Developers Survey 2022:
PyCharm has time-saving features for both template engines. For example, you can use gutter icons to navigate from templates to views, and vice versa – all in one click.
Flexibility and complexity
Jinja2 has a more complex syntax, while Django templates are less flexible and more restricted. There’s hardly any difference for basic applications, but you may face some limitations if you need to perform advanced operations in your templates.
For example, Jinja2 lets you define macros, which are reusable blocks of code:
{% macro greeting(name) %}
Hello, {{ name }}!
{% endmacro %}
{{ greeting("Alice") }}
{{ greeting("Bob") }}
Other examples of more flexible syntax in Jinja2 include:
- Mathematical operations.
- Built-in filters for string formatting and manipulation.
- The ability to assign variables.
The functionality of Django templates has been intentionally restricted, but for good reasons, including:
- Separating application logic from representation.
- Security: Prohibiting arbitrary code execution in templates helps to prevent injection attacks.
- Keeping templates accessible for non-programmers, such as designers.
Both template engines allow you to create custom tags and filters. If you’re using PyCharm for Django development, you can benefit from its support for custom template tags.
Extensions and customizations
Many limitations in Django templates can be compensated by using additional libraries. However, it’s important to remember that any extra dependency may negatively affect your application’s performance and security. Here are some popular extensions for Django templates:
- django-crispy-forms: introduces the
|crispyfilter and the{% crispy %}tag to let you format Django forms easily and beautifully. - django-widget-tweaks: adds the
{% render_field %}tag for customizing form fields by using an HTML-like syntax and a bunch of template filters for tweaking form fields and CSS classes. - django-ckeditor: provides a WYSIWYG rich text editor so that your application’s users can add their own content as formatted text.
In Jinja2, you can also import extensions for the sake of customization or even more sophisticated logic. For example, Loop Controls adds support for break and continue in loops. The following loop will stop after processing 10 users from the users list:
{% for user in users %}
{%- if loop.index >= 10 %}{% break %}{% endif %}
{%- endfor %}
The Debug Extension lets you use the {% debug %} tag in Jinja2 templates to explore the context without setting up a debugger.
By the way, PyCharm lets you debug Django templates without any extra tags. Another great feature is the real-time preview of Django templates. The IDE renders templates as you edit them, so that you don’t need to switch to your browser.
URL dispatcher
URL dispatcher redirects incoming requests to specific views depending on the requested URL. Flask and Django handle this in different ways.
Routing
In Flask, routing is done by adding decorators to functions. Basically, here is how you create the application logic in Flask:
- Describe the desired behavior in a Python function.
- Decorate the function with
@app.route. - Specify the URL pattern in the parameter of the decorator (for example,
@app.route(‘/’)).
It’s as simple as that. Here’s the full code of a “Hello world” application in Flask:
from flask import Flask
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route('/')
def hello_world():
return 'Hello World!'
if __name__ == '__main__':
app.run()
Django uses dedicated Python files (usually, urls.py) in order to match the requested URL with the corresponding view (piece of application logic). Views are written separately in views.py. To show a page with “Hello World!”, your application must include the following files:
- views.py: The app logic goes here.
- urls.py: The routing is done here.
- project’s urls.py: As Django is designed to have multiple applications in one project, you also need to include the URLs of the application in the project’s urls.py file.
To launch the “Hello World” application in Django, you also need to perform a few preliminary steps:
- Create a project.
- Create an app.
- Launch the Django server.
Thankfully, if you are working in PyCharm, all that is done automatically. For more information about creating Django projects in PyCharm, follow our Django app tutorial.
So, here is where Flask’s minimalistic approach shines. Its routing system is simple and intuitive, which perfectly fits small projects, especially learning ones. You can create your first Flask app in a matter of minutes, or use PyCharm’s Flask project template, which includes a sample “Hello World” application.
In complex cases, Django will be able to offer more powerful and flexible routing. To compensate for Django’s challenging routing system, PyCharm features a dedicated Endpoints tool window.
Handling URL parameters
URL parameters are variable parts of the URL that are used to send additional information to the application. Both Flask and Django support positional and named parameters, as well as type converters.
One advantage of Django is that it allows using regular expressions in URL patterns with the help of the re_path() function:
urlpatterns = [
re_path(r'^user/(?P<username>\w{0,50})/$', views.user_details),
]
If you add such a pattern to your Django application, you’ll be able to request a URL, like /user/john/. The application will call the user_details function passing “john” as a parameter.
Compliance with RESTful principles
REST (Representational State Transfer) is an architectural style for web applications and services. Building web applications in accordance with REST principles is considered a best practice.
Flask enforces REST principles by design. It allows you to define routes for different HTTP methods separately.
In Django, views are associated with URL patterns regardless of the HTTP verb (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc.). The subsequent differentiation is provided by the view, which is usually a class with the respective methods (get(), post(), put(), delete(), etc.):
This doesn’t mean that you can’t create a RESTful API in Django. Django REST framework is a package for developing web APIs that provides generic class-based views, a browsable API, serializers, and many other useful features. To build your first API in Django, follow our DRF tutorial.
Working with databases
Most web applications deal with data. Data is stored in databases, which are provided by different vendors. Let’s look at database support in Django and Flask.
Django has built-in Object Relational Mapping (ORM). ORM allows manipulating data in databases like objects in code. Django’s ORM supports PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL, Oracle, and SQLite. Here’s what Django developers tend to choose, according to the Django Developers Survey 2022:
If you are going to store data in non-relational databases, like MongoDB or Redis, keep in mind that there is no native support for them in Django. According to the above survey, only 6% of developers use databases that are not officially supported by Django.
Another feature that facilitates database management in Django applications is the migration system. Django creates migrations automatically based on the changes you make to the application code, and then applies them to the connected database. Migrations are database-agnostic, can be put under version control, and allow for convenient rollbacks.
To work with migrations, the built-in manage.py utility is used. It provides a set of commands for managing migrations. PyCharm has a convenient manage.py console with code completion, which makes operations with migrations easier.
What can Flask offer? Nothing is built in, but virtually anything can be implemented. You can, for example, use SQLAlchemy, Flask-Peewee, or Flask-Pony for ORM, or store your data in NoSQL databases with Flask-PyMongo, Flask-Cassandra, or Flask-Redis.
Authentication and authorization
Authentication means controlling who can access your web application, while authorization means providing specific permissions to those with access.
Django’s built-in authentication system handles both. It supports both users and user groups, and provides tools for granting and checking permissions. There are also a bunch of third-party packages for advanced authentication capabilities, including SSO, LDAP, and two-factor authentication.
Django also comes with an admin interface. The built-in admin app provides a ready-to-use interface for content management. After registering your models in admin.py, you’ll be able to perform CRUD (create, read, update, delete) operations on them.
A vast majority of developers who took part in the Django Developers Survey find admin and auth very useful:
To enable the admin app, add it to the list of installed apps in settings.py and provide a route for ‘admin/’ in urls.py. In PyCharm, Django admin is enabled by default and no additional steps are required. Just make sure that the Enable django admin checkbox is selected when creating your Django project.
Being inherently lightweight, Flask doesn’t offer any authentication or authorization features out of the box. However, there are extensions that can be integrated into your Flask application and work well together. For example, Flask-Admin provides an admin interface combined with ORM support, while Flask-Login and Flask-Security add the essential authentication features.
The downside of such an approach is that these extensions are not part of Flask and have their own release cycles, which may result in backward compatibility issues.
Testing
Testing is an integral part of professional web development. Let’s see what the most popular web frameworks have to offer us for testing our web applications.
Both Django and Flask have built-in testing support compatible with the native Python’s unittest module. They also provide a test client for sending HTTP requests to the application.
One of the few differences lies in handling the databases during testing. If your tests involve database operations, Django will create separate test databases for them. In Flask, developers need to manually ensure that their production database is not affected by tests. Third-party extensions, like Flask-SQLAlchemy, can help with that.
If you would like to benefit from advanced features of specialized testing libraries, such as pytest, you can use pytest-flask or pytest-django.
To test the API of your web service or application, try PyCharm’s HTTP Client. It lets you create and execute HTTP requests right in the code editor.
Architecture
As you may already know, there are two main styles in software architecture: the monolithic one and microservices.
Monolithic applications are ‘normal’ applications: They have a single codebase written in one programming language, are built and deployed as a single unit, and often have unified data storage.
Microservices architecture, on the other hand, involves developing a suite of small applications, where each unit is responsible for one thing and communicates with the others by means of an API. Every microservice has its own database, is deployed and scaled independently, and fails independently, without putting down the whole system.
Django encourages creating projects with several apps, where each app takes over a specific function. That might sound very similar to microservices, but it’s not. There’s still a single codebase and often a single database.
If you choose to develop with Django in PyCharm, you’ll always have access to a bird’s-eye view of the whole project structure in the Django Structure tool window:
Flask, the microframework, seems to be a perfect choice for microservices. With Flask, you can easily create a bunch of lightweight apps, empowering each with only the tools and extensions it requires. Full compliance with RESTful principles will also be a great help in establishing stateless connections between the microservices.
Django can be used in exactly the same way, although in this case the components of the system will be not so compact because of Django’s “batteries included” philosophy. But as long as you can use any stack for each particular microservice, you might as well develop a Django one when you need some Django-specific capabilities.
Learning curve
Django is a complete framework, which results in a more challenging learning curve. On the other hand, you don’t need to learn anything besides Django. Everything a newbie usually needs, like ORM, authentication, authorization, and more, is already available in the main package, which comes with extensive documentation.
A Flask application can be created in seconds by writing just a few lines of code in a single file. So, if you are looking for a quick start, Flask may be a better choice. However, you have to be ready to explore extensions and other packages if you decide to develop your project further.
At the same time, Django projects tend to have more concise and consistent architecture. This results in shorter onboarding times when developers join already running projects.
From a team lead’s perspective, it’s also very important to take into account the needs and capabilities of your team.
Conclusion
At the end of the day, should you use Flask or Django?
It’s really difficult to say which Python web framework is better, let alone the best.
Both Django and Flask are equally suitable for many different tasks, but there are also so many aspects in which they differ. Every developer will make their own decision as to which framework to use, taking into account their skills, goals, and the nature of the projects they’re working on.
FAQ
Which is better: Django or Flask?
Both Django and Flask are modern, well-supported, and regularly updated frameworks. None of them is ‘better’, but you can choose which framework better suits your needs based on how complex your application or service will be, its architecture, the skills of your team members, etc.
If you are choosing your very first web framework for learning, you may want to start with Flask. It will be easier for you to learn Django afterwards.
Should I learn Django or Flask for a job?
Both frameworks are very popular, and you definitely need to know at least one of them to work in web development. However, learning both will help you land a job faster.
Is Django still relevant in 2023?
Yes. According to the Python Developers Survey 2022, Django was used by 39% of Python developers. The preliminary results of the Developer Ecosystem Survey 2023 show that Django’s popularity remains high at 40%.
Is Flask easier than Django?
Yes, from a learner’s perspective, Flask is a more accessible framework. A basic Flask application can be created in a single file in no time, whereas writing a “Hello World” in Django requires creating a few files and other preliminary steps.
At the same time, Django is a self-contained and well-documented framework, which means that you can use it to build a full-fledged project without having to choose and incorporate any extensions.
Is the Django framework the same as the Flask framework?
While both Django and Flask are popular choices for web development with Python, they are different in many aspects and each suits different use cases.
Django is generally used for larger, more complex projects that can benefit from its “batteries included” approach and numerous built-in features.
Flask is a good choice for simple applications or microservices. It’s a minimalistic framework that offers developers the flexibility to add the functionality they need.
Can you use Flask with Django?
Mixing Django and Flask in one application doesn’t make much sense, although it is technically possible. They have overlapping functionalities and often handle similar tasks in a different way. Bringing both Flask and Django into one project will cause unnecessary confusion and complexity.
However, combining Flask and Django can be justified in specific cases, for example, as you migrate your project from one framework to another. Another case is microservices that may require specific features, or be developed by teams with different skill sets.
Useful links
PyCharm for Django development
Documentation
- Django documentation
- Flask documentation
- Jinja documentation
- Django support in PyCharm
- Flask support in PyCharm
Tutorials
Videos
Subscribe to PyCharm Blog updates
