Muting a code review in Upsource 2017.2

Let’s say you’ve just fixed a typo in a branch that is undergoing a code review or committed some other minor change. Now, you’ve become one of the authors in this branch review, even though you probably don’t want to follow the review progress.

Unlike watchers and reviewers, authors cannot simply remove themselves from a code review, but in Upsource 2017.2 it is possible to mute it.

If you mute yourself in a code review like that, you will stop receiving updates in your news feed as well as email and browser notifications.

Mute Review

Your userpic will reflect that you’ve muted a review, however, only you will see that. You can unmute the review the same way: hover on your userpic and click “Unmute” – leaving comments in this code review does not unmute you automatically.

If you’re a reviewer or a watcher you can also mute reviews. As opposed to leaving a review, a muted review will still appear in pre-defined search results.

Posted in Feature | Leave a comment

Code review for .NET projects in Upsource

As you know, Upsource has IntelliJ IDEA at its core which brings IDE-level code insight right into your browser. This helps teams that code in Java, PHP, Python, Kotlin, and JavaScript perform code review in a more efficient manner.

This, however, doesn’t mean that projects written in other languages cannot use Upsource as a code review tool. In fact, all of the smart code review functionality such as progress tracking, workflow automation, and intelligent suggestion of reviewers and revisions is language-independent. The only teams that cannot use Upsource are the ones using exotic version control systems. Git, Mercurial, Subversion, and Perforce are supported out of the box.

For some languages, there are extra benefits available that may not be obvious from the first glance. In this post, I’d like to go over some Upsource features that a .NET team can use to make their code reviews more efficient.

ReSharper Code Inspections

Although there’s no built-in ReSharper engine in Upsource, it can receive and present the results of code analysis performed on your TeamCity server.

Note: If you don’t know what TeamCity is, check it out – it’s a great CI server and it’s free up to 20 build configurations.

TeamCity has a built-in ReSharper inspections runner that can be part of your build pipeline. After a simple setup, TeamCity will start sending the results of static code analysis to Upsource, and you’ll be able to see them right in the code.

Resharper Code Inspections

Needless to say, having code analysis warnings at hand during a code review can be of great help when evaluating a changeset.

Upsource Integration plugin for Rider

If you’re using Rider, a cross-platform .NET IDE combining the power of the IntelliJ platform and ReSharper, you can also benefit from Upsource IDE integration plugin.

Having this plugin installed, you can create code reviews when you commit a change, get notified about any updates relevant to you, participate in discussions, review someone else’s changes, and so on – straight from your IDE. This means that you can leverage all of the IDE’s power to help you complete a code review faster and increase its value.

Check out this article to learn more about the plugin’s features.

General Code Review Assistance

Another way Upsource can help a .NET team become more efficient at code reviews is by eliminating all the unnecessary manual work. You can automate your workflow and make sure all the critical code parts and changes are covered, as well as set up automatic assignment of reviewers for each new code review:

Custom Workflow

If you prefer, you can also create reviews manually, of course. In this case, Upsource will suggest reviewers based on historical data of code commits and code reviews, and when a new revision appears, Upsource can let you know if it might be related to a code review in progress:

Revision suggestion

Code review is an iterative process. If a reviewer finds problems in a new change, the author needs to address them and commit a new change which also needs to be reviewed. Upsource tracks reviewer’s progress and optimizes the process – when a new change arrives, the reviewer needs to only look into that latest change, not the whole changeset.

Progress Tracking

You can use labels to help prioritize concerns raised in discussions and resolve discussions when the problem has been addressed or the question has been answered.

You can also integrate Upsource with your issue tracker and create issues straight from discussions, and, if you’re using JIRA, apply transitions for your iteration workflow automatically.

These features can help a .NET team perform code reviews more efficiently, but there’s a lot more to Upsource! Project analytics, powerful search, comprehensive repository exploring, transparent team collaboration, and many small-but-handy features here and there that generally make Upsource so pleasant to work with. If you haven’t yet, give it a try!

Posted in Feature | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Upsource 2017.2

Good news, everyone – Upsource 2017.2 is here! It comes with a number of highly anticipated features, brings some fun elements into your daily routine and, as usual, enhances the existing functionality. Here’s a quick recap.

  • External Inspection Engines

    Running SonarQube inspections? Or ReSharper/IntelliJ Inspections on TeamCity? Now you can see the results straight in Upsource. This makes a reviewer’s job even easier than before, especially if you’re working on a .NET project!
    ReSharper Code Inspections in Upsource
  • Python Support
    Code insight functionality is now also available to teams using Python. As for other supported languages this includes code-aware navigation, static code analysis, Find Usages and Usages diff.
    Python support
  • Reactions
    When there’s no need for an elaborate answer, give your feedback in a fast and compact form using a reaction.
    Reactions
  • GitLab Support
    We’ve received a number of requests to support GitLab merge requests, so you’ll be pleased to know that you can now perform code review for your GitLab merge requests in Upsource.
  • NPM Support
    To improve “Go to declaration” and “Find usages” in JavaScript code, we install dependencies listed in your package.json file using npm or yarn (whichever is required).
    NPM support
  • Suggested Revisions in Reviews
    We have employed advanced statistical analysis to suggest revisions that should be added to a review. Similar to the reviewer suggestions that were implemented several releases ago, this is another powerful tool that helps you review code more efficiently.
    Suggested Revisions in a Review
  • Achievements
    To make it easier to discover new features and to add some fun to your interactions with Upsource, we are introducing an achievements/badges system. So far we’ve added only a few basic achievements but that’s just the beginning!
    Achievements

That’s not all of it! If you’d like to learn more about the new Upsource 2017.2 features, please check out the What’s New page. See the complete list of changes in our issue tracker.

To try Upsource 2017.2 download the build and don’t forget to backup your current instance!

Posted in Release | 8 Comments

Upsource 2017.1.1922 Is Here

Please welcome a fresh update for Upsource 2017.1 (build 1922). This minor release brings a number of bug fixes and improvements, including IntelliJ IDEA plugin fixes and usability problems. Please check the full list of the Release Notes for more details.

Download the latest Upsource 2017.1.1922 and enjoy all the fresh goodies!

The Drive to Develop!

The Upsource JetBrains Team

Posted in Newsletter, Release | Tagged , | 7 Comments

Welcome Upsource 2017.1.1892

Introducing a bug fix for Upsource 2017.1 (build 1892). This minor update brings a lot of useful fixes and enhancements, including a number of fixes for IntelliJ IDEA plugin, and TeamCity integration, such as showing the build status on the review page:

TeamCity Integraion

To get more juicy details about the new build, please check the full list of the Release Notes.
Download Upsource 2017.1.1892 today and enjoy all the fresh goodies!

The Drive to Develop!

The JetBrains Upsource Team

Posted in Newsletter, Release | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Automating Your Code Review Workflow with Upsource

The last three posts on code review workflows show that there’s more than one way to do a code review, and that the approach you take will depend upon what you want to achieve with your reviews and the type of team you’re working with.

In this post, we’ll cover how Upsource aims to make your workflow, whatever it looks like, simpler by automating as much of it as possible. We’ll show the types of things that can be easily automated, when this might be useful, and show how to achieve it.

Automatically Create Reviews

If your workflow is predictable in who reviews code, you don’t need to manually create reviews and add reviewers, you can have Upsource do this for you. In this example, we’ll assume that you have a single individual who reviews all code that is committed.

Steps:

This is achieved using Custom Workflows.

  1. Log in as an administrator and go to the administration page by clicking on the settings icon settings-icon
  2. Select the project you want to enable automatic code reviews for, and click its Edit project button.
  3. Click on the Custom workflows link on the right of the page.
  4. Under the “Create reviews automatically” heading, click the Enable check box, then click the Add trigger button that appears.
  5. For our specific example, we’re not going to enter any authors or branch/path information, we want all code by all authors to be reviewed by our designated reviewer. You can see that Upsource suggests all the users in this project, so you can simply select one from the list.

    Trigger for automatically creating reviews

    Figure 1: Configuring a trigger for creating reviews

  6. Once this has been saved, you can see the details of the trigger:

    Trigger is set

    Figure 2: Viewing the trigger details

  7. Next time anyone checks in code, a code review for this commit will be created automatically, to be reviewed by Reviewer:
Review automatically created

Figure 3: The automatically created review

Notes:

By default, this creates a new review for every commit. You can optionally set the review to automatically track the branch it is on, which may be suitable if the team uses feature branches or a similar workflow.

05OptionallTrackBranch

Figure 4: You can optionally set the created review to track the branch

There are other options to allow commits to be bundled into a specific review, for example using issue IDs or code review IDs to automatically add a commit to a review.

Suitable for:

  • May be used for gateway code review process, where either one individual usually approves changes to code, or there’s a set of reviewers who are all automatically added to all reviews. Not so suitable for this process if the author usually makes a series of commits but only wants them to be reviewed when the code is “finished”.
  • May be used for design evolution reviews, in this workflow you may choose all commits to be reviewed by all (or most) of the team.

Vary the Automatically Assigned Reviewers

The previous automation is useful if you a) know which developers will be required as reviewers and optionally b) can assign these based on either branches or code paths. Most teams are more flexible around who they assign to reviews, particularly if they’re following an iterative approach or using code review for knowledge sharing. Upsource can assign randomly selected reviewers from a given pool of suitable developers.

In this example, we’re going to specify a pool of developers who can be randomly assigned to review any code from any developer.

Steps:

  1. We’re going to enable a second automated workflow as well as the previous one. Firstly, we need to set up the automatic creation of code reviews, like we did in the last example. The only difference is that this time we do not assign reviewers (see Figure 1 – in this second example we do not add reviewers).
  2.  While we’re on the Custom workflows section, we need to go to the “Assign review participants automatically” heading. Here, we click the Enable check box, then click the Add trigger button that appears.

    Assign reviewers trigger

    Figure 5 – Assign review participants automatically trigger

  3. As usual, Upsource will suggest users for both the “Created by” and “Users” fields. We’re going to leave the “Created by” field blank, because we want this to apply to all developers. But you can imagine that if you wanted this workflow to apply to just the junior/new developers, you could add them to this box.
  4. We’ll select a set of reviewers for all code reviews. This could be just the most senior/experienced people on the team, or could be all developers if you’re aiming for shared code ownership with your reviews.
  5. Now, we have the option of either assigning everyone in this pool to be a reviewer, or getting Upsource to select a random subset of these reviewers for each review. We’re going to configure Upsource to pick one person randomly, so the reviewers don’t get overloaded with too many reviews, and so that everyone gets to see all parts of the code.

    Pick random reviewer

    Figure 6 – Configure Upsource to select a single reviewer randomly from the pool

  6. Click the Save changes button.
  7. Now, whenever anyone checks in code, a review will automatically be created, and a random reviewer assigned.

    Review created

    Figure 7 – Review created and random reviewer assigned

Suitable for:

  • Teams who want developers to break out of silos, encouraging them to review code outside their usual zone
  • Knowledge sharing – by assigning random reviewers to each commit, the whole team can eventually get to see changes to the whole code base.
  • Iterative design – this can be used to assign the whole team as reviewers or watchers to every commit, or it can be used to randomly select reviewers. This latter option may be a good way to reduce some of the noise when using code reviews for design evolution.

Automatically add commits to a review by Issue Number

Many teams already tag every commit with the ID of the bug/feature ticket in the issue tracker. If this is standard practice for your team, and you want to create a code review for every issue, then you can turn on the feature in Upsource that will do this for you.

Steps:

  1. Follow steps 1-3 from the first example to navigate to the Custom workflows page.
  2. Go to “Add revisions to a review automatically” and tick the checkbox. As before, click Add trigger to define the settings.

    Create Issue ID Trigger

    Figure 8 – Create a trigger on Issue ID

  3. Don’t forget to click Save changes.
  4. You will still need to create a code review for the first commit with a comment containing a keyword in the right format (either a Jira or YouTrack issue ID, or a predefined issue ID format), unless this is combined with one of the other automated workflows. But subsequent commits with this issue ID will be added to the code review for the issue.

    Commits added to Review

    Figure 9 – Commits with the same issue number are added to the same review automatically

Suitable for:

  • Teams who do not work on feature branches but use issue numbers to group their commits.
  • Teams who already tag all commits with issue numbers, or who would like to do this.
  • Applies to all code review workflows.

Automatic integration with GitHub

This has been covered in previous blog posts. Upsource’s bi-directional integration with GitHub makes it easy to synchronise pull requests (reviews) and comments, so no matter whether a reviewer or author prefers to use the GitHub UI or Upsource, all the information is available in both tools.

Suitable for:

  • Teams who use GitHub
  • Open Source projects using GitHub where external contributors use the GitHub UI and internal team members have access to an Upsource instance.

Summary

Upsource has a number of options to help you automate your code review workflow. Just as there are many tools that automate the routine things to examine in your code (e.g. static analysis tools and automated tests) which should be used to minimise the load on your code authors and reviewers, there are ways to ease the creation of code reviews according to your workflow.

One of the options described above might suit your need, or more likely a combination of them will cover a vast majority of the cases where code reviews need to be created for your team, so you don’t even need to remember to create a review and assign people to it.

Posted in Code review practices, Newsletter | Tagged | Leave a comment

Upsource 2017.2 Roadmap

It’s been a month since we released Upsource 2017.1 and, of course, we are moving forward. Today, we would like to share our plans for the 2017.2 release which is planned for Q3 2017.

600x400_blog_UP_2017_2_@2x

Support for External Inspection Engines

Upsource is renowned for having a built-in IntelliJ IDEA engine that we use, among other things, to show inspections in code. It’s also behind the Code Analysis Summary that you see in reviews. However, there are a lot of tools on the market that specialize in static code analysis and we don’t want to limit ourselves just to inspections from IntelliJ. We are working to support external inspection runners, be it ESLint or SonarQube, or IntelliJ global inspections and ReSharper inspections bundled with TeamCity, with the goal of presenting their results alongside our own inspections.

Suggested Revisions in Reviews

We have employed advanced statistical analysis to suggest revisions that should be added to a review. Similar to the reviewer suggestions that were implemented several releases ago, this is another powerful tool that helps you review code more efficiently.

Achievements

Upsource grows up and suggests more and more cool features to make code review and code browsing better. We want to make it easier to discover new features and to add some fun to your interactions with Upsource. We plan to introduce an achievements/badges system to accomplish these goals and open doors for other engaging and useful experiences.

“Discussions” page

We are working on a new page that lists all of the discussions that are happening in a project chronologically and lets you search and filter the discussions.

NPM Support

To improve “Go to declaration” and “Find usages” in JavaScript code, we are working to support TypeScript definitions for packages that are listed in your package.json file.

Better Python Support

While basic Python support is available in Upsource, pip isn’t. We are working to address that.

Reactions

Everyone loves reactions in Slack, right? Reactions help you give feedback in a fast and compact form, saving time for everyone. We are eager to provide you with such an ability in Upsource.

We share this public roadmap to give you insight into our current direction. Unfortunately, we can’t promise to include everything listed here in the upcoming version, but we’ll definitely do our best. Also, we’re moving to shorter release cycles and aim to provide you with shiny new features as soon as they are ready. So, stay tuned for updates, and don’t forget to share your feedback by adding your comments here, using our issue tracker, or just by contacting our support team.

Your Upsource Team

The Drive to Develop!

Posted in Announcements, Newsletter | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Upsource 2017.1 Bug Fix Is Out

Upsource 2017.1.1821 is available! This minor update includes a number of important bug fixes, as well as a couple of enhancements, including Elixir and Twig syntax highlighting support.

elixir

Check out the full Release Notes for more details.

Download the latest Upsource version today to enjoy even more productive code review.

Posted in Newsletter, Update | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Code Review for Knowledge Sharing

In the last two posts we talked a bit about how effective those approaches are for the author to learn and improve, because those two approaches focus on getting the code correct. The Design Evolution approach additionally mentions the value of the whole team seeing the evolution of the code.

This third approach for code reviews puts learning at the centre of the process — the purpose is not to check if the code is correct, but to share with other developers what changes have been made.

In this example, I’m assuming a slightly different approach to development. This team develops against master (or some other centralised development branch), and submits small self-contained commits that pass all the automated tests.

The Process

In this example we assume the team is not working on feature branches, but instead commits directly to some main development trunk. It’s important in these circumstances to have a CI system that runs all relevant checks, and that failures here are addressed with the highest priority

When I work on a fix or feature, as usual I’ll make changes in small, self-contained commits that pass all the tests. This should be the default way of working, of course, but when you’re committing to the main development branch this is so important, it ensures the whole team isn’t blocked on some breakage you introduced. Upsource integrates with your CI server so you can see at a glance the revisions that passed all the checks.

Upsource shows the result of the Continuous Integration build

In this code review process, I can either make each small change a tiny review in its own right, or I can batch them up into a single review when the feature is complete1. The first approach has the advantage that the review will be small, but there will be many of them. The second approach means the review will probably be bigger, but gives me much more freedom to experiment and evolve my design during implementation.

In Upsource, I can either choose to add each revision to the review via the UI

02AddToReviewUI-2

…or I can use the IntelliJ IDEA plugin to select which code review to add the commit to…

…or I can tag the commit with an issue number or code review ID to have it automatically added to a review.

Using this process, we’ll see groups of commits on the same branch belonging to different code reviews.

When the reviewer comes to look at the code, they have very different goals to either a gateway reviewer or a design evolution reviewer. Here, the reviewer’s goal is to read the code to: understand what functionality was introduced and see how the application code is evolving. Of course, the reviewer is still free to make comments and suggestions. If a reviewer doesn’t understand the code for any reason (poor naming, confusing design, missing tests to document features etc) this is an important point to raise — code is likely to be read more often that written, and if a team member cannot understand the code right now, when the current state of the code base and the context of the need for the fix or feature is fresh in their mind, imagine how much worse it will be in the future when all of this context is lost.

I can make changes based on these suggestions and also commit these straight into the development branch. I’ll get the reviewer to look over these changes too, to see if they address the original problem.

As always, I can guide the reviewer, and future code-readers, by leaving comments in Upsource to document the more obscure code, or make notes of possible future changes.

By having these comments in Upsource but not attached to a review, future readers of this code will be able to see what my intentions were.

Discussion

Here the main beneficiary of the code review is the reviewer not the code author. It’s a way to encourage ownership of the whole code base by the whole team, without everyone having to work on all sections of the code.

It also emphasises code readability. While enforcing standards or design approaches will help readability, these may be too heavy-weight for many teams. Peer-reviewing code can improve the readability by focusing on small but important things like naming and understandable tests.

This process does not act as a gateway. Code is already merged, it’s assumed to be working as all tests pass. Any suggested changes can be made later, and made directly to the development branch as well.

The reviewer can be junior or new, they’re not acting as the guardian of the code design. Many teams see this as a good way to get people up to speed on their whole code base with fairly minimal cost to the more experienced developers on the team.

Advantages

  • No waiting for the review to finish before merging the changes into production-ready code
  • Shared code ownership reduces the bus factor for the team
  • Focus on code readability can improve the code’s maintainability
  • Since the aim is to help all the team understand the code, reviewers can (and should) be developers of all levels, and junior or new developers’ comments are as valuable as those of more experienced team members — your code should be understandable to everyone.
  • A reviewer is likely to spend far less time on this kind of review than on a strict-correctness review like a gateway review.
  • There are likely to be far fewer iterations than a design evolution review, and probably fewer than a gateway review. This means not only will the review take less time, but also there’s likely to be less work-in-progress since code authors won’t be working on other things while also iterating over the code review.

Disadvantages

  • If you do not have automated tests to catch important things (automated acceptance tests to “prove” the fix/features does what it should; automated regression tests; automated performance test for perf-critical systems; automated security tests etc) or dedicated departments (QA, performance, security etc) to own those areas, it’s possible that code that doesn’t work, or breaks something, could go into production, due to the focus on readability rather than strict correctness2.
  • Given the code is already merged and “working”, there may be a temptation to review the code “later”, so code reviews (and subsequent feedback) may happen when the context of the original fix are not so fresh in the author’s mind.

Anti-patterns

The anti-patterns for the previous two code reviews are things that block the code review finishing, and therefore block the code going into production. Since this approach assumes the code is going into production and the review is for learning and sharing, there’s nothing in the code review process that blocks the code going live.

Suitable for

  • Teams with the highest level of trust that the developers only commit code that meets the team’s standards.
  • Or code bases that don’t need strict control over the design and can tolerate multiple different programming approaches.
  • Teams with shared code ownership
  • Teams with all key requirements tested (either automated tests or a QA team)

 

1 “Complete” meaning passes all appropriate tests, e.g. acceptance tests, and/or meets the acceptance criteria set in the issue
2 Of course, these reviews are still more likely to catch problems than no reviews at all

Posted in Code review practices, Newsletter | Tagged | Leave a comment

Upsource 2017.1 Is Out

UPsource 2017_1

Please welcome Upsource 2017.1, the first major product update this year! We’ve worked hard the last several months to deliver a set of fresh goodies to make your code review process smoother and more productive. We believe that productive teamwork is the key to a successful project, and we are here to make your team code collaboration soar higher than ever.

This time we introduce cross-project full-text search, revised Reviews page, review progress, browser notifications, squash/rebase support, new workflows, and more.
Watch a short What’s New video to see the main Upsource 2017.1 goodies in action.

And now let’s take a closer look at new features of 2017.1.

Cross-Project Full-Text Search

Full text search

Upsource has always been an expert in searching and navigating inside the codebase. To expand our search capabilities, we’ve implemented cross-project full-text search. Upsource searches across all branches and even finds deleted code.

If you’re considering a refactoring that affects multiple projects, or want to retrieve a piece of code you deleted last week, or wondering if someone from your team or company is already using a new web API that appeared in Chrome last week, Upsource will definitely help.

Review Suggestions in Revisions List

Review Suggestions
Upsource now detects situations when someone is modifying files that were authored by someone else in the past, and suggests creating a review. In one click, the review will be created and the owner of the code will be assigned to review the changes.

Review Progress

Review Progress

Have you ever experienced a situation when reviews you create are just ignored by the reviewers? Do they really ignore you, or maybe they’re just too busy? Now you can check how many files were viewed and when was the last time your colleague came around: Simply open the review and hover over the reviewer’s avatar.

Merge Status on Reviews Page

Merge branch without conflicts

Upsource 2017.1 checks and informs you whether a branch can be merged without conflicts. Please note that this feature works only for GitHub projects.

Browser Notifications

Browser Notifications 426

Now you can choose to receive notifications in your browser to keep track of important events without switching from your IDE. You can get notified when a review is created, reopened, closed or accepted, and more. Note that you need to have an Upsource tab open in your browser.

Squash/Rebase Support

Squash:Rebase Support

Upsource 2017.1 supports squashed Git revision, and updates the history to display new commit ids and new commit messages from the VCS. The review timeline also reflects the reasons old revisions have disappeared from the review.

New Code Review Workflows

We’ve added two new workflows to automate your code review processes:

  • Close Reviews Automatically: closes the review automatically after all reviewers have accepted changes.
  • Resolve Discussion Automatically: marks all discussions as resolved upon closing
    the review.

Code Review Workflows Enhancements

  • Add revisions to reviews automatically: we’ve added a new options that allows to ignore merge commits.
  • Create review automatically if commit message contains issue ID.

You can find these workflows under Administration->Projects->Edit project->Custom Workflows.

GitLab Support

We’ve added basic GitLab support, which lets you see pull requests from GitLab in Upsource. At the moment Upsource supports only gitlab.com. This is an initial step towards full-scale GitLab support. We’ll keep working to extend this functionality in future releases.

Docker support

Upsource 2017.1 is available as a Docker image. Enjoy easy setup with recommended system settings applied out of the box!

Enhancements

Revised Reviews Page

Revised Reviews Page
The Reviews page now sports five predefined searches that let you quickly jump to reviews you are interested in: Created, Assigned, Rejected, Mentioned, and Completed. If you’ve ever felt overwhelmed with reviews requiring your attention, the new design will help you focus.

Redesigned Administration Area

Redesigned Create Project

We’ve revised and redesigned the Create/edit project form. What was previously one long page is now a series of tabs, with all the fields rearranged in a more logical way.

New User Profile

User Profile
Please welcome a new, fully interactive User Profile! Open your commits, check and comment the changes, create issues and add labels from the Recent Activity feed. Your profile page can now serve as your landing page, pointing out all the details and actions you need to process your commits and reviews.

Support for Gradle advanced settings

We’ve enhanced code intelligence for Gradle so that you can configure Gradle properties and Gradle init script. For example, you can specify your Proxy server location via Gradle properties.

Support for Android Studio Projects

Upsource 2017.1 handles Android projects like pure Java, Kotlin, and other languages. Now it resolves dependencies and creates a code model for Android projects.

Query Assist

Query assist
In this version we’ve added new query keywords, closed-by and closed to filter reviews by the user who closed the review and by a closing date.

Fira Code

If you like your functional code extra-fancy, the font added in IDEA 2016.3 is now available in Upsource.Fira Code

The brand-new and shiny Upsource 2017.1 is waiting for your feedback! Download the latest version today and enjoy all the fresh goodies. Please check the Release Notes if you are thirsty for more details.

The Upsource Team
The Drive to Develop

Posted in Newsletter, Release | Tagged , | 17 Comments