Analyzing ineffective memory usage with dotMemory

Memory issues in .NET apps can be generally divided into 1) leaks, 2) large memory traffic, and 3) ineffective memory usage. In this blog we’ve written extensively about how dotMemory helps you deal with the first two problems. Now it’s time to talk about analyzing ineffective memory usage, especially since dotMemory 4.3 introduces a new feature that can help really fight this issue.

Before we move on, let’s agree on some terms. What is ineffective usage? When your app consumes more memory than it should, or could, we call this ineffective. Sometimes you just “feel” that a particular algorithm consumes too much, but nothing seems to explain why it does. That’s when you should use a memory profiler.

Assume you’ve done the profiling and taken a memory snapshot. What next?

There are two main analysis approaches that may be combined or used independently. Start by answering the following two questions:

  • What methods allocate the most memory?

  • What objects retain the most memory?

What Methods Allocate Most of the Memory?

This task is typically solved with the help of a call tree. Most memory profilers have a special call tree view for determining the calls that allocated the largest amounts of memory. Doesn’t sound too complicated, does it? But in fact, even for mid-size projects digging into the tree may become a headache.

Call Tree

Of course, this algorithm is applicable to dotMemory as well. However, since version 4.0 we offer a much easier way called Call Tree as Icicle Chart.

The idea behind the chart is simple – it’s a graphical representation of the call tree. Each call is shown as a horizontal bar whose length depends on the size of objects allocated in the call’s subtree. The more memory allocated in the underlying subtree, the longer the bar. The bar’s color value serves as an additional indicator – the more memory allocated by the call itself, the darker the bar.

Call Tree Icicle Chart

So instead of looking at lots of numbers, start your analysis by opening the Call Tree as Icicle Chart view. In just a glance you can match a certain call with the amount of memory it allocates.

For example, the following chart shows the same data as the Call Tree table in the GIF above. Notice how there’s no need to dive into the call tree: main memory allocations can be seen instantly.

Icicle Chart Example

Of course the chart is interactive: just click a call to see its call stack. Use the Shift+click combination to zoom into the chart and examine the call chain in more detail.

Icicle Chart

Who Retains the Memory?

Understanding how memory is retained in your app is essential for successful optimization. For example, you know that a major part of memory in your app is consumed by strings. Nevertheless, most likely, the subject of your optimizations is not these strings by themselves but the data structures that store them. That’s why “Who retains the memory?” is the next big question when analyzing ineffective memory usage.

Objects that exclusively retain other objects in memory are called dominators. Earlier dotMemory versions offered just one way of analyzing app dominators – the Group by Dominators view, which shows the tree of dominators sorted by retained memory size:

Group By Dominators View

Since version 4.3, dotMemory offers a new “visual” way of analyzing dominators: the Sunburst Chart. In this view, the dominators hierarchy is shown on a sunburst chart. The more memory a dominator retains, the larger the central angle.

Dominators Chart

A quick look at this chart shows what objects are crucial for your app and helps you evaluate the largest structures.

Sunburst Chart

If you click on a particular dominator, the Domination Path on the right will show you the retention path of this dominator. Double-click on a dominator to zoom into the chart and see the objects retained by this dominator in more detail.

Our experience shows that Dominators chart is also very effective when you need to quickly evaluate how a certain functionality works in your app. For example, below are two charts built for an image editor application: the first one was plotted before anything is done in the app, and the second one reflects memory usage after the user has applied an image filter.

Example of Two Dominators Charts

After some time, if you profile your app constantly, you’ll even be able to “see” not only how your app works, but even how particular changes in code affect memory usage.

Thanks for reading! We hope this post was helpful. Give dotMemory 4.3 a try and explore the Dominators and Call Tree charts.

This entry was posted in How-To's and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Analyzing ineffective memory usage with dotMemory

  1. Pingback: The Morning Brew - Chris Alcock » The Morning Brew #1847

  2. Pingback: Dew Drop – April 24, 2015 (#2000) | Morning Dew

  3. it seems like it would be an impressive feature to build into TeamCity the ability to generate these icicle charts and sunburst charts while creating an animation of them over time. So you could watch the change over time to your system’s memory usage over time.

  4. Pingback: Automate the Planet

  5. Interesting Diagrams. Thanks for the Blogpost.
    Greetings.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *